Move deals forward with credible AI assurance.
Reduce deal friction by giving buyers current evidence of how each AI system is owned, governed and reviewed.
| System | Risk | Score |
|---|---|---|
Case Summary Assistant AIS-014 · Current | High | 92 |
Meeting Transcription AIS-021 · Current | Limited | 84 |
Case Triage Assistant AIS-027 · Review due | High | 61 |
Document Extraction AIS-033 · Current | Minimal | 78 |
Assurance at the speed of the deal.
Enterprise buyers now assess AI systems the way they assess security. Deals slow when the answers live in scattered documents. HumanWox turns the maintained record into the answer.
A buyer sends an AI questionnaire mid-cycle, covering ownership, risk classification and human oversight.
Responses are drawn from the maintained record for that system, not reassembled from documents and email.
The buyer receives a structured, signed assurance report showing the system, its owners, risks, controls, evidence, decisions and review history. They verify it themselves at verify.humanwox.com with no login and no account.
CivicNote Ltd · Procurement review
- RSK-014Inaccurate ranking reaches a hiring decisionHigh
- CTL-108Mandatory human approval before offerRequired
- EVD-341Review logs, approval rates and rejectionsCurrent
Make governance verifiable.
Produce a report the auditor, the customer and the board can each rely on, drawn from the same record. Every assurance report is signed and independently timestamped, and the reader verifies it themselves at verify.humanwox.com with no login and no account.
Framework coverage is calculated from the risks, controls and evidence the team already maintains, and shows gaps honestly rather than a flattering percentage.
- Scope
- Systems, risks, controls, evidence, decisions
- Signed by
- HumanWox, on behalf of the organisation
- Timestamp
- eIDAS advanced, 10 Apr 2026 14:22 UTC
- Manifest
- sha-256 · 9c1a…f8d2
- Verify at
- verify.humanwox.com/r/UA-2026-04
- Clause 4, Context8 covered1 partial0 gap
- Clause 5, Leadership5 covered2 partial0 gap
- Clause 6, Planning6 covered1 partial2 gap
- Clause 7, Support9 covered2 partial1 gap
- Clause 8, Operation11 covered3 partial2 gap
- Clause 9, Evaluation4 covered2 partial1 gap
- Clause 10, Improvement3 covered1 partial0 gap
One connected record. Multiple outcomes.
Customer assurance and audit readiness are not separate programmes. They are outputs of the same maintained AI accountability record, read through different lenses.
- Systems and accountable owners
- Risks and applicable controls
- Signed, timestamped evidence
- Decisions and review history
Current answers for buyers assessing your AI systems.
Questionnaires and vendor reviews answered from one source.
Evidence, decisions and reviews ready for examination.
Clause coverage calculated from the record as maintained.
Obligations tracked per system against its classification.
Portfolio status, exposure and overdue work for the board.
Maintain audit and assurance readiness.
HumanWox helps organisations maintain a connected record of risks, controls, evidence, decisions and reviews for customer due diligence, audits and regulatory review as AI systems change.
The register holds every system and its owners. Attention items surface expiring evidence, overdue control tests and pending decisions before they lapse.
| AI system | Owner | Risk | Lifecycle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate Screening Assistant | R. Patel | High | In production |
| Support Copilot | M. Owen | Limited | In production |
| Contract Clause Extraction | S. Ahmed | Limited | In review |
| Onboarding Recommendation Model | J. Byrne | Limited | Piloting |
- Evidence expires in 6 daysCandidate Screening Assistant
- Control test overdueSupport Copilot
- Deployment approval pendingOnboarding Recommendation Model
Assign business, technical and risk ownership.
Register each AI system with its purpose, classification and lifecycle status. Assign the people accountable for it: a business owner, a technical owner and a risk owner, together with the reviewers responsible for oversight.
Leadership and auditors can see which systems are governed and who holds responsibility for each.
- D. Cole, Responsible AI LeadQuarterly
- L. Fernández, Internal AuditAnnually
System profile. Ownership, classification and reviewers on the record.
Connect every decision to its basis.
Link risks, controls, evidence, decisions and reviews so each assurance claim can be traced to the record that supports it.
Inaccurate summary reaches a case record.
Mandatory human approval before a summary is saved.
Review logs showing approval rates and rejections.
Human review retained after the March model change.
Quarterly product review, 14 April 2026.
- 01RSK-021Risk
Inaccurate summary reaches a case record.
- 02CTL-108Control
Mandatory human approval before a summary is saved.
- 03EVD-341Evidence
Review logs showing approval rates and rejections.
- 04DEC-088Decision
Human review retained after the March model change.
- 05REV-040Review
Quarterly product review, 14 April 2026.
Guidance, Frameworks and Assessment.
Practical guides, briefings and research on maintaining audit and assurance readiness across ISO/IEC 42001 and adjacent frameworks.
The AI Accountability Playbook
How to maintain a trusted record of AI systems, ownership, risk, evidence, decisions and oversight. Includes the five records every organisation needs and a 7-day starter plan.
What is an AI system record and why does it matter
The single object every governance framework now expects you to maintain.
The governance record explained
How ownership, evidence, and review fit together across the AI lifecycle.
Start maintaining audit and assurance readiness.
Register AI systems, assign ownership and maintain the record behind customer assurance, audits and governance obligations.